Attention: CLE rules have temporarily changed in several states due to the Coronavirus Pandemic. MCLEZ is monitoring these changes and will provide updates as they occur. Click here for details.

CLE rules have temporarily changed in several states due to the Coronavirus Pandemic. MCLEZ is monitoring these changes and will provide updates as they occur.

Alabama: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Alaska: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Arizona:The Supreme Court of Arizona has issued an Order extending the deadlines for both the completion of mandatory continuing legal education hours and the required affidavit of compliance, solely for the educational year 2019-2020. The deadline for completion of the necessary hours is extended through December 30, 2020; the deadline for submission of the affidavit of compliance is also extended through December 30, 2020.

California: The State Bar of California has issued an order extending the late CLE deadline, which was previously June 30, 2020, to September 30, 2020 for attorneys in Group 3 who have not yet completed their MCLE requirement. Failure to complete the requirement by September 30, and pay any outstanding license fees, will result in being enrolled in Involuntary Inactive status.

Connecticut: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Florida: The Florida Bar issued an order extending CLE reporting deadlines for February, March, April and May 2020 to August 31, 2020. All other annual compliance deadlines remain the same.

Georgia: The Supreme Court of Georgia issued an order temporarily waiving the 6 hour in-person CLE requirement until the late CLE deadline on March 31, 2020. Georgia attorneys can now complete their full 12 hour requirement through self-study, in-house or online seminars.

Illinois: The Illinois Supreme Court has issued an order extending the MCLE deadline by 90 days (to September 30) for attorneys due in 2020 (last name A-M) who are unable to complete their requirement by June 30. To receive this extension, attorneys must log in to the MCLE Board's website and report "Not Yet Completed" by July 31. No reason for the extension is required.

Indiana: The Indiana Supreme Court has waived the credit-hour limitations on distance education courses for attorneys whose three-year Educational Period ends on December 31, 2020. Those credit-hour limitations are amended for all other attorneys whose educational periods expire on or before December 31, 2022 may obtain no more than 24 hours of distance education. https://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-other-2020-20S-ms-239.pdf

Kansas:On April 8, 2020, the Kansas Supreme Court issued Administrative Order 2020-RL-033. This order modifies continuing legal education attendance and reporting deadlines, and waives the limitation on prerecorded programming through September 30, 2020

Kentucky: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Maine:The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has issued an order temporarily waiving the in-person CLE requirement. Maine attorneys may complete their entire CLE requirement via On-Demand courses until further notice. In addition, the Board of Overseers of the Bar for the State of Maine has extended the reporting deadline to May 1, 2020 and will not impose any late fees for the 2018-2019 reporting period.

Mississippi: The Supreme Court of Mississippi approved the waiver of the in-person requirement for MCLE so that attorneys may earn all their credits through online programs or live webinars. The Court also extended the deadline to September 30, 2020 with a reporting deadline of October 15, 2020. This waiver and deadline extension also apply to newly licensed attorneys whose new lawyer requirement deadline is July 31, 2020. https://courts.ms.gov/appellatecourts/docket/sendPDF.php?f=700_496517.pdf&c=91465&a=N&s=2

Missouri: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Montana: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Nevada: No rule changes have been made at this time.

New Hampshire:No rule changes have been made at this time.

New Jersey: The Supreme Court of New Jersey issued an order temporarily relaxing the 12-hour live classroom credit requirement. Until further notice from the courts, New Jersey attorneys may fulfill their entire CLE requirement through approved courses offered in alternative verifiable learning formats.

New York: No rule changes have been made at this time.

North Carolina: No rule changes have been made at this time.

North Dakota: Effective immediately and continuing until further notice attorneys in Reporting Group 3, who report in 2020, will be allowed to earn all or a portion of the required 45 credits through self-study. Three (3) ethics CLE hours will still be required. https://www.sband.org/news/496604/Important-News-from-the-ND-CLE-Commission.htm

Ohio: The Ohio Commission on Continuing Legal Education has waived the self-study cap for the 2018-2019 Late Compliance period and extended the deadline to June 29, 2020. Ohio attorneys who still need to finish their CLE requirements from the 2018-2019 compliance period can do so by watching On-Demand programming.

Oklahoma: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Pennsylvania: The April 30, 2020 CLE compliance deadline is extended to August 31, 2020. Click Here to View Court Order

South Carolina: Chief Justice Donald Beatty issued an order on March 17, 2020, allowing lawyers who failed to comply with the 2019-2020 CLE requirements to earn all or any portion of the required 14 hours of CLE credit for the annual reporting year through online or telephonic programs.

Tennessee: On March 27, 2020, the Supreme Court issued an order allowing attorneys to use unlimited online hours to establish their compliance for the 2020 compliance year. Attorneys seeking reinstatement in 2020 are also covered by the order.

Texas: The State Bar of Texas has granted the following automatic extensions for their CLE requirement: (1) A 60 day extension for attorneys with March, April, or May 2020 compliance deadlines; (2) A 60 day extension for missed January or February 2020 compliance deadlines, to prevent the assessment of further fees; (3) A one month extension for attorneys subject to suspension for failure to comply with MCLE requirements in November or December 2019.

Utah: The Supreme Court Board of Continuing Education issued an order suspending all requirements for the in-person CLE requirement until June 30, 2020. Utah attorneys can now complete their required hours through webinars and other self-study courses.

Vermont: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Virginia:The Supreme Court of Virginia issued an order April 14, 2020, extending a number of compliance deadlines that affect Virginia lawyers to ease their professional responsibilities during the COVID-19 emergency. The order extends the MCLE compliance deadline from October 31, 2020 to December 31, 2020.

Washington: No rule changes have been made at this time.

Home Log In | Shopping Cart | Check Out
CLE Courses Free CLE CLE State Bundles VA Live Webcasts

Washington CLE and MCLE Courses

MCLEZ online continuing legal education courses are for Washington State attorneys who want to make the most of their time and money. For as little as $19.99 per course, easily earn Washington CLE credit online through courses which have been produced in a variety of legal subjects that matter to you.

Try a course for free before you make your purchase with our Free CLE program. To easily fulfill all of your allowable online CLE hours, see our Washington Bundles page under State CLE Bundles.

MCLEZ provides online continuing legal education programs which have been individually pre-approved for self-study credit by the Washington State Board of Mandatory Continuing Legal Education.

To view a list of approved MCLEZ courses, visit the myWSBA website and search for MCLEZ as a sponsor, or call 800-945-9722.

NOTE: Courses should be limited to 8 hours of instruction per day (or an average of no more than 8 hours per day for multi-day courses) because a lawyer can earn no more than 8 credits per day. (Reg 103(c))

Washington CLE Course Catalog

Search Practice Area:

 

A Modern Look at Contractors v. Employees

View Course Details

A Modern Look at Contractors v. Employees Details


Price:
$29.99

Course Description

Whether you're a business owner concerned with making the right distinctions when engaging people to work with/for you, or a lawyer responsible for advising clients on the contractor v. employee distinction, this presentation could save you a lot of grief and money down the line.

Marin County-based employment lawyer Diana Maier and Carlos E. Torres, a Hearing Officer for the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), discuss which factors matter most in deciding how to classify workers in light of recent legal decisions that are shifting those factors. In addition to covering a broad overview of the contractor v. employee debate, they also discuss ethical considerations for lawyers considering the question of contractor classification, and assess whether the sharing economy is due for extinction in light of recent rulings against companies such as Uber.

Course Agenda

Frequent Terms and Their Meanings
  • Principal versus Employer
  • Worker/Contractor/Consultant versus Employee
Central Questions
  • What are some ethical considerations to keep in mind as we review the material?
  • Why are we here?
  • Factors in classification
  • Advantages and disadvantages of each classification
  • How does the government know/find out?
  • What are the penalties if you get it wrong?
  • What do you do to protect yourself?
Sharing Economy
  • What is the sharing economy?
  • Worker classification ? independent contractor
  • Classification lawsuits
    • Lyft, uber, washio, homejoy, shyp, postmates, instacart, handy
Ethical Issues Revisited
  • Ethical considerations
    • Model rules of professional conduct
    • Rule 2.1 ? advisor
  • Given that this is a subjective standard, what ethical considerations exist for attorneys who need to advise others about this? Complicated by the fact that 1099 is less expensive.
  • Do you pick the argument most conducive to the business and just go with that?
  • How do the political/social factors come into play?
  • Are there law and policy objectives lawyers have a duty to protect?
  • If there are, has current law accomplished those, or have we gone too far?
Cases: Practicing the Material
  • Case #1: Client Engaging New Service Providers
  • Case #2: Corporate Employer
  • Case #3: Domestic Employer
Wrap Up
  • Standard is subjective ? makes it a tricky ethical issue for lawyers
  • Government prefers employee status
  • Back up a decision to make someone a contractor by making a file, contract, etc. and know there?s a risk
  • Government most often finds out via an obstructed claim, but there are many ways
  • Recent indications show government is only going to get more strict in enforcement

Course Credit per State


AZ - General: 1.0 Credits
CA - General: 1.0 Credits
CT - General: 1.0 Credits
FL - General: 1.0 Credits
IL - General: 1.0 Credits
MO - Self Study: 1.2 Credits
NY - General: 1.0 Credits
PA - Distance Learning: 1.0 Credits
WA - General: 1.0 Credits
WV - General: 1.2 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Diana Maier

Diana Maier is an employment and privacy law expert who founded The Law Offices of Diana Maier, PC, a San Francisco Bay Area company that provides exceptional customer service in privacy and employment law. Diana and her team advise companies on the legality of their workplace privacy and employment practices, litigate cases when needed, and conduct workplace investigations. Diana is certified in both European Union and US privacy laws and is a fluent Spanish-speaker.

Diana attended Stanford Law School and graduated in 1998. She received a Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service, magna cum laude, from Georgetown University in 1992.

Diana began her legal career as a Public Defender for Santa Clara County, where she spent each day in the courtroom defending misdemeanor, felony, and three strike cases. She enjoyed great success in winning trials for her clients and felt that she had found her ?calling? in life. But in 2003, Diana decided to transition to a career that was more sustainable for family life, and she began practicing employment law. She joined forces with the plaintiffs? employment law firm Bushnell, Caplan & Fielding, LLP, which later became Bushnell, Caplan, Fielding & Maier, LLP. Diana left the firm in 2008 in order to launch the Law Offices of Diana Maier and focus more on the defense side of employment work, particularly litigation preventative work.

In early 2013, Diana began working as outsourced In-House Counsel for Labor and Employment and Privacy Law for Quantum Corporation in Silicon Valley. To handle this role more skillfully, Diana earned two privacy credentials, CIPP/US and CIPP/E, through the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). Diana?s CIPP/US and CIPP/E certifications represent her dedication to thoroughly understanding global privacy laws for the benefit her clients. By knowing and applying privacy and data protection laws and regulations in the United States and Europe, Diana is able to ensure privacy compliance on a global scale.

Diana is a frequent speaker and writer on an enormous range of topics in employment and privacy law. She presents a quarterly public webinar (which can be found on her website under ?Lunchtime Legal Chats?) and also frequently speaks to the Marin County & San Francisco Bar Associations, as well as numerous non-attorney organizations. She has been published in The Recorder, the ABA Journal, and countless online publications, and she is often cited as an expert in news stories pertinent to employment and privacy law. You can find handouts from her presentations and articles featuring her at www.dianamaierlaw.com/resources. Diana is the former Chair of the Marin County Bar Association Labor and Employment section, and she serves as an advisor in the areas of employment law and privacy to Casetext, a legal start-up organization in Silicon Valley.

Diana's legal hobbies are blogging on employment and privacy law issues and exploring the practice of compassionate law, the idea that lawyers can be problem solvers and healers of conflict rather than just combatants for hire. Diana especially enjoys serving on the Board and heading up the Fundraising Committee of OneJustice, a California based legal non-profit that provides legal services to marginalized populations who otherwise wouldn?t have access to an attorney.

You can read Diana?s blog at www.dianamaierlaw.com/employment-and-privacy-law-blog-by-diana-maier/ and also read about her talented staff at www.dianamaierlaw.com/about/staff-bios/. Her email is diana@dianamaierlaw.com, and her phone number is 415-515-1707. In addition, you can find her on LinkedIn and on Twitter under @DianaMaierLaw, to name just a few social media sites where Diana likes to ?hang out? and talk law.

  Course Price:
$29.99
 
 

Credit Damages and their Application in Cases: An Overview

View Course Details

Credit Damages and their Application in Cases: An Overview Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

Credit damage and loss of credit reputation can occur when misconduct by a third party results in negative information appearing on a credit report that leads to an individual or business to lose access to credit that was available prior to the damage. The ability to identify and assess a client?s credit damages can increase the value of a damage demand significantly in litigation matters. This damage can result in increased out-of-pocket costs, loss of credit capacity and loss of credit expectancy (the inability to obtain any new credit or new credit at the same interest rate category as pre-injury).

As credit reputation damages become more common, courts are rejecting the defense?s "subjective" argument and allowing credit reputation damage as a general or special injury. Attorneys should learn how to identify such damages and undertake a credit damage investigation whenever a significant monetary loss appears to have occurred. This program examines credit report issues and credit reputation damage compensation and helps attorneys identify these potential damages in a wide variety of cases.

Course Agenda

  • Why are ?Client Credit Damages? important? The ability to identify and assess a client?s credit damages can increase the value of a damage demand significantly in litigation matters.
  • Statutes: In California, the applicable statute is California Code of Civil Procedure Section 3333. Other states may have similar statutes.
  • When do Credit Damage and Loss of Credit Reputation Occur? Definition: Credit damage and loss of credit reputation can occur when misconduct by a third party results in negative information appearing on a credit report that leads to an individual or business to lose access to credit that was available prior to the damage.
  • Typical LossesInvolved: This damage can result in increased out-of-pocket costs, loss of credit capacity and loss of credit expectancy (the inability to obtain any new credit or new credit at the same interest rate category as pre-injury).
    • Examples of Credit Damage and Loss of Credit Reputation.
    • Typical cases where Credit Damage May Apply:
    • Personal injury
    • Improper real estate transactions
    • Identity theft
    • Breach of contract
    • Fraud
    • Malpractice (i.e., legal, medical)
    • Mortgage delinquency/modification programs
    • Health insurance coverage rescission
    • Contested divorce
    • Partnership disputes
  • Complaints from Clients: Examples and How to Increase Awareness of Attorneys to Credit Damage
  • Example: Property Owner?s Insurance Claim Ignored by Insurer
  • Example: Contested Divorce
  • Credit Reputation Damage As a Special Injury: Case Law
  • Need to Include Credit Reputation Damage in Damage Demands
  • Typical Indicators
  • Assessing Credit Damage Demand
  • Questions to ask clients. Consumer Credit Reports.
  • What Can Be Used in Court?
  • What Subscriber Credit Reports Reveal
  • Measuring Credit Reputation Damages
  • Conclusion: As credit reputation damages become more common, courts are rejecting the defense?s "subjective" argument and allowing credit reputation damage as a general or special injury. Attorneys should undertake a credit damage investigation whenever a significant monetary loss appears to have occurred.
  • Review: Questions and Answers

Course Credit per State


AZ - General: 1.0 Credits
CA - General: 1.0 Credits
CT - General: 1.0 Credits
FL - General: 1.0 Credits
NV - General: 1.0 Credits
NY - General: 1.0 Credits
WA - General: 1.0 Credits
WV - General: 1.2 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Georg Finder

Georg Finder, an Orange County, CA Independent Credit Evaluator (ICE), is an expert on credit reporting violations and credit damage measurement. He has more than 20 years of experience evaluating credit reports and has appeared as an expert witness for both plaintiff and defense. He is an expert on credit report issues and credit reputation damage compensation and teaches a certified Credit Damages Assessor (CDA) program through the Financial Education Academy.

James Ellis Arden

James Ellis Arden is an attorney in California who on litigation and appeals involving civil procedure and attorney malpractice issues. He is rated AV-preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell. Arden writes andlectures on legal practice, technology, and ethics. He authors the ?TechnoEthics? column in GPSOLO magazine, published by the ABA General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Division. Arden is a member of the Association of Professional Responsibility Lawyers (APRL), the Professional Responsibility and Ethics Committee (PREC) of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, and the California State Bar Committee on Professional Liability Insurance (COPLI). In the olden days, he studied psychology and computer programming.

  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

Depositions

View Course Details

Depositions Details


Price:
$24.99

Course Description

In this course, attorney David Graulich will cover the basics of depositions in civil litigations. David is a plaintiff's attorney himself, but will discuss depositions from both the plaintiff's and the defense attorney's side. By the end of this session, attorneys who have never been involved in a deposition, as well as those who have, should be able to leave with some useful tools for future depositions.

Course Agenda

1. Preliminaries
  • Purpose of the Deposition
  • Who Will Be Present
  • When to Depose
  • Where to Depose
2. Going on the Record
  • Preliminary Matters
  • Stipulations
  • Introduction
3. Style of Questioning
  • Using an Assistant
  • Documents
  • Cross-examination
4. Coping with Objections and Other Problems
  • Form of the Question
  • Privilege/Protected Work Product
  • Motion to Compel
5. When Your Side Is Deposed
  • Defending Attorney Role
  • Preparing the Deponent
  • Making Objections
  • Maintaining Contact
  • Asking Questions

    Course Credit per State


    AZ - General: 1.5 Credits
    CA - General: 1.5 Credits
    CO - General: 1.62 Credits
    CT - General: 1.25 Credits
    FL - General: 1.5 Credits
    IL - General: 1.25 Credits
    MO - Self Study: 1.5 Credits
    NV - General: 1.0 Credits
    NY - General: 1.5 Credits
    PA - Distance Learning: 1.5 Credits
    WA - General: 1.25 Credits
    WV - General: 1.62 Credits

    Course Presenter(s)

    David Graulich, Esq.

    Mr. Graulich worked over 20 years in journalism and the public relations industry. He represented companies such as PepsiCo, Schwab and Computer Sciences Corp., advising senior executives on communications policies. Mr. Graulich received his law degree at the University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law. Mr. Graulich is currently working in private practice and resides in Sacramento, California.

  Course Price:
$24.99
 
 

Drafting Software Development Agreements

View Course Details

Drafting Software Development Agreements Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

This session provides an overview of the practice of drafting and negotiating software development agreements. Topics to be covered include: pros and cons of waterfall vs. agile approaches to software development; myths of SDAs; SDA clauses of interest; term definitions; warranties; intellectual property concerns; breach of contracts and possible remedies; negotiation styles; negotiation tips for SDA?s; and a list of resources for future reference, including SDA examples and checklists.

Course Agenda

  • Software Development
  • Waterfall vs. Agile Software Development
  • Agreement Components
  • The Software Development Agreement (SDA)
  • Myths of SDA?s
  • Contract Requirements
  • SDA Clauses of Interest
  • Points of Interest
    • Definitions
    • Pricing/Payment
    • Exclusivity Clauses
    • Disclosure/Confidentiality Requirements
    • Security Clauses
    • Indemnity Clauses
    • Assignments
    • Termination
    • State Law Jurisdiction
    • Warranties
    • Insurance
    • IP Issues
    • Make it present tense ?hereby assigns? not future tense
    • ?Work for hire? language is ineffective without a specific transfer of the copyrights
    • Sublicensing, Transferability
    • What about a merger? Can that breach non-assignment provisions?
    • In US: each joint copyright owner may commercialize a copyrighted work WITHOUT their joint owner?s consent, but must account for licensing royalties and may not destroy the value of the work.
    • Address this in your SDA.
    • IP Issues
    • Software Escrow
    • Breach of Contracts
    • Remedies
    • Negotiating Tips

    Course Credit per State


    AZ - General: 1.25 Credits
    CA - General: 1.25 Credits
    CO - General: 1.2 Credits
    CT - General: 1.5 Credits
    FL - General: 1.5 Credits
    IL - General: 1.25 Credits
    MO - Self Study: 1.5 Credits
    NY - General: 1.5 Credits
    WA - General: 1.25 Credits
    WV - General: 1.58 Credits

    Course Presenter(s)

    Deborah Gonzalez

    Deborah Gonzalez, Esq. is the founder of Law2sm, LLC, a new legal consulting firm focusing on helping its clients navigate the legal issues relating to the new digital and social media world.

    Deborah graduated from New York Law School. Following graduation, she built a successful boutique practice in New York City, focusing on the arts, music and entertainment scene. In 2007, Deborah relocated to Georgia where she was employed by the University System of Georgia. In 2008 she was granted reciprocity to practice law in Georgia.

    Deborah's practice has taken her from an inner-city arts community center in NYC to a sidewalk café in Eastern Europe; from preparing programs for diplomats in the EU to assisting medical missions with refugee communities in Thailand; from protecting against music piracy in the US to protecting against bio-piracy in South America. And now it is transporting her beyond the Internet to the social space where the physical and digital dimensions of her clients co-exist and where she can leverage her legal expertise to their benefit.

    Deborah enjoys engaging with those around her - so social media is a natural fit. But it is her skill in being able to connect the dots to understand the next big paradigm shift in global communication and legal application that makes her a leader in social media law. Deborah serves as Chair of the GA Bar Association's Annual Program on Social Media and the Law and serves as a social media legal liaison for social media marketing companies and their clients (such as Chick-fil-A and Nestle). In addition, Deborah speaks on the legal issues relating to intellectual property; art, music, and digital entertainment law; and social media legal trends and practices in various venues throughout the United States and abroad.

  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

Ethical Issues in EB-5 and DACA Cases

View Course Details

Ethical Issues in EB-5 and DACA Cases Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

In this presentation, David B. Gardner, who is a specialist in immigration law in California, will be speaking on ethical issues involving EB-5 (the immigrant investor visa program) and DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) cases, which are very relevant and pertinent issues in immigration law practice today. He will discuss how the government has attempted to fairly regulate the foreign investor visa industry, and some of the major difficulties that have arisen in doing so.

Course Agenda

  • The EB-5 Visa
  • Direct Investment
  • Regional Centers
  • EB-5 Market
  • Ethical Dilemma
  • Scope of Representation
  • Regional Center
  • Investment
  • Attorney Liability
  • Regional Center?s Law Firm
  • DACA

Course Credit per State


AK - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
AZ - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CO - Ethics: 1.2 Credits
CT - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
FL - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
MO - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NV - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NY - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
PA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WV - Ethics: 1.2 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

David B. Gardner

David B. Gardner has more than 30 years professional legal experience advising clients on U.S. Immigration, International Business and Taxation matters. Mr. Gardner was admitted as a Solicitor in England and Wales in 1974, and as a Solicitor in Hong Kong in 1984. He founded the Law Offices of David B. Gardner in 1985 as an international law practice and since 1996, following a law firm merger, has practiced exclusively in the areas of Immigration and Nationality Law.

Mr. Gardner represents clients in all types of immigration cases before Agencies of the Department of Homeland Security, the Executive Office for Immigration Review and in the Federal District Courts and Circuit Courts of Appeal. He was lead counsel in Vukmirovic v. Ashcroft, 362 F. 3d 1247(9th Cir. 2004.) and Vukimorivic v. Holder (9th Cir. Sept. 2010).

Mr. Gardner was co-founder of several non-for profit organizations including the Spirit of Youth foundation (an exchange program between under-privileged youth from Los Angeles and in the United Kingdom); the California Israel Chamber of Commerce and the Southern California Israel Chamber of Commerce. He was awarded the honor of Cavillieri by the Government of Italy for legal services on behalf of the Italian Consulate in Los Angeles. He is a past president of Bnai David Judea Congregation in Los Angeles and continues to be active in a variety of local and international community organizations.

  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

Ethical Issues in Terminating the Attorney-Client Relationship

View Course Details

Ethical Issues in Terminating the Attorney-Client Relationship Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

In this presentation, George Chiu, Esq. will address one of the most important issues facing attorneys, which is when, how, and if you are able to terminate the attorney client relationship. This course will be focused largely on Rule 3-700 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. He will provide practical tips and pointers, specifically focused on trying to meet the requirements of the California Rules of Professional Conduct, trying to avoid malpractice claims, and avoiding discipline from the State Bar.

Course Agenda

  • The Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Five Steps to Terminating The Attorney-Client Relationship
  • Deciding to end attorney client relationship
  • Creating the File
  • Telling the client about termination
  • Cautions
  • Things to keep in mind
  • Form Language
  • Final Thoughts

Course Credit per State


AK - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
AZ - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CO - Ethics: 1.14 Credits
CT - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NV - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NY - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WV - Ethics: 1.14 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

George Chiu, Esq.
George Chiu, Esq. has extensive experience in transactional matters, including mergers and acquisitions, securities, and banking.    In addition to practicing law in the United States, Mr. Chiu has served as Director of Legal affairs for the Ascension Capital Group in Beijing and General Counsel to T2CN Information Technology of Shanghai, China.   Mr. Chiu is fluent in English and Chinese and speaks French and Korean. He earned his Juris Doctor from UCLA in 2003 and is admitted to the Bar in Massachusetts, California, Texas, and Oklahoma.
  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

Ethical Issues of Contemporary Criminal Justice

View Course Details

Ethical Issues of Contemporary Criminal Justice Details


Price:
$29.99

Course Description

Ethical Issues of Contemporary Criminal Justice explores standards of professional responsibility specific to legal representation, law enforcement, and corrections in the United States. Attorneys will define and apply concepts in the analysis of law and policy through an increased awareness of the Model Rules and Codes of Conduct. This course examines current prominent cases and their dilemmas to effectively present relevant ethical issues in an easily understandable context.

Course Agenda

  • Overview
  • Model Rules of Professional Conduct
  • The Law, the Right to Practice and the Legal Professional:
    • Right to practice  
    • Sources of regulation  
    • Preventing unauthorized practice of law 
  • Duties of Those who Practice in Criminal Justice System:
    • Prosecution for the people
    • Defense for the accused
    • Judges for everyone
  • Fees and Contracts:
    • Formation of relationship between client and lawyer
    • Agreement and scope of representation
    • Terminating the lawyer-client relationship
  • Confidential Information:
    • Attorney-client privilege
    • Duty of confidentiality
    • When confidences are waived
  • Unimpaired Loyalty and the Avoidance of Conflicts of Interest:
    • Personal interests that may affect objectivity
    • Concurrent representation of clients with conflicting interests
    • Conflict between current and former clients
  • Obligations to Third Parties and the Legal System:
    • Counseling or assisting illegal or fraudulent conduct
    • Requirement of honesty in communications
    • Threats of criminal prosecution
  • Special Obligations to Lawyers in Litigation:
    • Duty to reject actions brought merely to harass or injure
    • Limitations on trial publicity
    • Duty of honesty and disclosing perjury
  • Business of Practicing Law:
    • Solicitation and advertising
    • Regulation of specialization
    • Division of fees
  • District Attorney Issues:
    • Formal disciplinary process
    • Personal financial liability
    • Contempt sanction
  • Lack of Resources and the Responsibilities of Judges:
    • Disqualification and recusal
    • Extrajudicial money making 
    • Political activity and appearance of impropriety

    Course Credit per State


    AK - Ethics: 1.75 Credits
    AZ - Ethics: 1.75 Credits
    CA - Ethics: 1.75 Credits
    CO - Ethics: 2.1 Credits
    CT - Ethics: 1.75 Credits
    FL - Ethics: 2.0 Credits
    MO - Ethics: 2.0 Credits
    NY - Ethics: 2.0 Credits
    WA - Ethics: 1.75 Credits
    WV - Ethics: 2.1 Credits

    Course Presenter(s)

    Greg Woods, J.D.

    Greg Woods received his Doctor of Jurisprudence from San Francisco Law School and holds a Bachelor of Arts from San Jose State University. At San Francisco Law School Greg was a recipient of the Bernard Witkin Award for academic excellence in Contracts Writing and was an editorial staff member with the San Francisco Law Review. He served as a Certified Legal Intern with the Office of the District Attorney in San Francisco.

    Greg Woods presently serves as Lecturer with the Department of Criminal Justice Studies at San Francisco State University and was recently named Lecturer of Justice Studies at San Jose State University and at the Department of Criminology Studies at Sonoma State University.

    As an educator, constitutional scholar, law enforcement/legal trend watcher and student of history, Greg constantly seeks and receives information from a wide variety of sources and is in the forefront as a commentator on topical issues in Criminal Law.

    Outside the classroom, Greg has been acknowledged by former students at the annual San Francisco State Scholar Athlete Reception as a faculty member who ?made a valuable impact on their academic life.?

  Course Price:
$29.99
 
 

Ethics for Patent Attorneys and Patent Agents

View Course Details

Ethics for Patent Attorneys and Patent Agents Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

Patent attorneys are bound by their local State Bar Rules and the Code of Conduct contained in Code of Federal Regulations Title 37. Among the many local State Bar Rules addressed by Steve Nielsen are the duties to maintain client secrets, to maintain a client trust account and to address actual and potential conflicts of interest. Mr. Nielsen then walks through the Patent and Trademark Office Code of Professional Responsibility Canons and Disciplinary Rules, distinguishing between them, addressing each Canon and providing guidance on how to avoid disciplinary proceedings resulting from violations. From fee agreements to inventor conflicts of interest, security issues ranging from the basics of locks on file cabinets to encryption, to limiting business relationships with clients, Mr. Nielsen covers the spectrum of the disciplinary minefield. This is truly a program in which the adage "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" applies.

Course Agenda

  • Disclose Adverse Legal Authority
  • Inventor Conflicts
  • Threatening Criminal Prosecution
  • Fee Agreements
  • To Search or Not? No duty to search for prior art
  • Patent Litigation
  • Pre-Litigation Markman Analysis
  • Ethics of Pre Litigation
  • Litigation Blowback
  • Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) Tales of Woe and Anguish
  • Malpractice Suits
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Money Problems and Issues
  • Bad Checks
  • Tax Fraud
  • Bounced Checks to the USPTO

Course Credit per State


AK - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
AZ - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CO - Ethics: 1.2 Credits
CT - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
FL - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NY - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WV - Ethics: 1.2 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Steven A Nielsen
Based in Larkspur, California, Steven A. Nielsen is a U.S. registered patent attorney with many years of experience in patent procurement and in achieving favorable results in federal court in the field of intellectual properly litigation. Mr. Nielsen is the past chairperson of the Intellectual Property Section of the Marin County Bar Association. Mr. Nielsen received his J.D. in 1987 from Boalt Hall, University of California at Berkeley and also holds a B.A. in Computer Science. He may be contacted at steve@nielsenpatents.com, on his website, nielsenpatents.com or via his LinkedIn page.
  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

Got a Handle on Employee Leaves of Absence

View Course Details

Got a Handle on Employee Leaves of Absence Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

Jason A. Geller, Managing Partner of Fisher & Phillips' San Francisco office, addresses recent requirements for employer compliance with updated regulations under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) and significant distinctions between CFRA and the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Because these laws are quite similar in many respects, the description of an employer and employee's duties under CFRA will parallel those under the FMLA. Jason also addresses practical challenges faced by the parties in complying with these laws and suggested policies and practices to ensure compliance.

Course Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Review of rise of leave rights generally
  • The basic requirements under CFRA/FMLA
  • Distinctions between FMLA and CFRA
  • Important changes to CFRA regulations
  • Suggested changes to leave policies and practices

Course Credit per State


AZ - General: 1.0 Credits
CA - General: 1.0 Credits
CO - General: 1.32 Credits
CT - General: 1.0 Credits
FL - General: 1.0 Credits
IL - General: 1.0 Credits
MO - Self Study: 1.2 Credits
NV - General: 1.0 Credits
NY - General: 1.0 Credits
WA - General: 1.0 Credits
WV - General: 1.2 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Jason A. Geller

Jason A. Geller is the Managing Partner of Fisher & Phillips' San Francisco office. Fisher & Phillips is one of the largest U.S. law firms representing management exclusively in the areas of labor, employment, civil rights, employee benefits, and immigration law. The firm has 31 offices with 300 attorneys.

Jason represents employers in all facets of employment law matters. He has considerable experience defending employers in litigation involving claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and California wage and hour laws. Jason has also defended employers against whistleblowing and retaliation claims, including claims under the California Whistleblower Act, the False Claims Act and various provisions of The California Labor Code.

Jason has extensive experience defending employers in Federal and State courts, as well as in investigations by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the DFEH, United States Department of Labor (DOL) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

In addition to defending his clients in litigation, Jason frequently counsels employers to assist them in avoiding litigation. He regularly advises clients on leave management issues and the interactive process for employees with disabilities, reinstatement obligations under various leave laws and wage and hour compliance. Jason has prepared employee handbooks and a variety of agreements, including independent contractor, employment, confidentiality and trade secrets agreements.

His clients are involved in a variety of industries, including assisted living, independent living facilities, construction, manufacturing, engineering, architecture, professional services, agriculture, technology, retail and restaurant industries.

Jason was included in Northern California Super Lawyers in 2015.

Professional Activities
  • Board Member, Northern California Human Resources Association - East Bay Chapter
  • Member, Marin Human Resources Forum (1995-2000)
  • Member, Labor and Employment Section of the San Francisco Bar Association
  • Board Member & Legislative Co-chair, Employers' Advisory Council of the California Employment Development Department
  • Member, Labor and Employment Section of the State Bar of California
  • Member, Advisory Committee on Employment Law Jury Instructions of the Labor and Employment Section of the State Bar of California
  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

Legal Ethics: The Limits of Aggressive Counsel

View Course Details

Legal Ethics: The Limits of Aggressive Counsel Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

In this presentation Barry Kaye and Alan F. Broidy will discuss different issues that come up from professional responsibility angles, as well as statutory issues of malicious prosecution that could arise in the context when attorneys go beyond what they should be doing in their required ethical bounds. They will explore what role the attorney should be playing in terms of devising novel legal arguments. They will take look at what the courts say, as well as the existing codes of professional conduct.

Course Agenda

  • What is the limit?
  • Rules of Professional Conduct
  • Example
  • Elements of Malicious Prosecution
  • Drawbacks of Malicious Prosecution
  • Abuse of Process
  • No Malice?
  • The Franklin Mint (Manatt) Case
  • The Courts and Franklin Mint
  • Practicing outside of competency

Course Credit per State


AK - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
AZ - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CO - Ethics: 1.2 Credits
MO - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NV - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NY - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WV - Ethics: 1.2 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Barry Kaye

Barry Kaye, Esq. is a member of the faculty at Berkeley Law (Boalt Hall) and an innovative and detail-oriented attorney with a reputation for bringing people together and structuring complex transactions. His entrepreneurial character and versatile skill set have allowed Mr. Kaye to move deftly between the law and business and weave a unique, well-diversified practice. Mr. Kaye's professional history shows experience and expertise in three main areas: intellectual property, real estate and business. After graduating from law school, Mr. Kaye clerked for U.S. District Judge A. Andrew Hauk in Los Angeles.

Following his clerkship, Mr. Kaye joined Hennigan, Mercer & Bennett, where he was part of the team that successfully represented Orange County in their bankruptcy and securities litigation. His areas of practice currently include real estate, intellectual property and general business transactions and litigation. He has also developed an expertise in the state and federal "Do Not Call" regulations. In addition to practicing law, Mr. Kaye maintains a profile in the real estate and finance worlds. He earned his JD in 1994 from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and is an active member of the California and New York bars.

  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

The Ethics of Aging Clients

View Course Details

The Ethics of Aging Clients Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

Learning Objectives After this course, attendees will be able to
  • Describe the reasons for concern over the issue of diminished capacity in older clients
  • Understand the differences among testamentary, contractual and financial capacity for decision making in their clients
  • Identify the nine domains of financial capacity
  • Describe criteria for a lawyer to use in assessing a client's capacity for decisions
  • State generally how to assess an aging client's basic abilities that demonstrate capacity for decisions
  • Identify alternatives to guardianship or conservatorship for clients as the least restrictive choices
  • Understand the lawyer's role in financial elder abuse prevention and ethical choices in whether to report abuse
  • Consider options when using mediation of elder related issues.

Course Agenda

1. Introduction- why are we talking about this? 2. Ethical concerns with older clients, the risks to lawyers 3. The continuum of decisional capacity
  • Testamentary
  • Contractual
  • Financial
4. The Complexities of Financial Capacity
  • Nine domains or areas needed to have capacity
5. How do you determine a client's capacity?
  • Criteria every lawyer should use
6. The impaired client
  • Using surrogates
  • Considerations
  • Reasoning, appreciation, consistency
7. Least restrictive alternatives for your client 8. Ethical choices when a client is impaired
  • Dangers for the client with your choices
9. Financial elder abuse
  • Extent of the problem
  • The lawyer's role in prevention
  • Report abuse or not?
10. Ethical concerns in mediation of elder-related issues
  • Illustration
11. Summary

Course Credit per State


CA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
CT - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
FL - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
ME - Professional Responsibility: 1.0 Credits
NV - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
NY - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
PA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WA - Ethics: 1.0 Credits
WV - Ethics: 1.22 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Carolyn Rosenblatt

Carolyn Rosenblatt is an attorney and mediator with over 45 years of experience in her combined professions. Together with her co-presenter and husband, geriatric psychologist Dr. Mikol Davis, she founded AgingParents.com, a resource for families, and AgingInvestor.com offering training about aging issues for professionals. She is a consultant in aging and mediator and has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, Reuters, NextAvenue, Bankrate, ThinkAdvisor, Financial Planning, AARP, the National Safety Council journal and many other sources. Ms. Rosenblatt blogs at Aging Parents on Forbes.com. She is the author of The Family Guide to Aging Parents, ABA's Working with Aging Clients: A Guide for Lawyers, Business and Financial Professionals and Succeed With Senior Clients, A Financial Advisor's Guide to Best Practices. For more information, visit www.agingparents.com and http://www.aginginvestor.com.

Dr. Mikol Davis

Dr. Mikol Davis has over 40 years of clinical experience in mental health. He frequently assesses capacity for decision making in aging adults. He continues to provide direct mental health services. Dr. Davis creates many online courses and products to assist with understanding aging issues and has extensive experience in treating anxiety and depression for persons of all ages. He has a special focus on geriatrics. He is a mediator of family conflicts with issues about elders. He volunteers as a settlement panelist for Marin County Courts in high conflict family matters. Dr. Davis and his co-presenter Ms. Rosenblatt, share a passion for elder abuse prevention. He co-authored Succeed With Senior Clients, A Financial Advisor's Guide to Best Practices He and Ms. Rosenblatt have been married for 34 years. For more information, visit www.agingparents.com and http://www.aginginvestor.com.

  Course Price:
$19.99
 
 

The Five Fundamentals of Federal Employment Law

View Course Details

The Five Fundamentals of Federal Employment Law Details


Price:
$24.99

Course Description

In this course, attorney David Graulich will cover the five fundamentals of employment law. He begins by discussing title 7 of the Civil Rights Act, which basically begins the modern era of employment law. He will then will move on to cover at will employment, who is an employee? (employee vs. independent contractor), exempt or non-exempt? and the large area of leaves of absence law under the federal venue.

Course Agenda

1. Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act
  • Begins the modern era of employment law
  • First major move into regulating the private workplace
  • Race and gender discrimination
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission & right to sue letters
  • Griggs v Duke Power Co, 401 US 424 (1971)
  • EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch
  • Shifting burdens in litigation
2. At Will Employment 3. Who Is an Employee?
  • Employee vs Independent Contractor
  • Common law agency test
  • Economic realities test
  • IRS rules & case law
  • Employment laws only protect employees
4. Exempt or Non-Exempt?
  • Why is this important
  • Brain vs Muscle framework
  • 50% rule ? exempt vs non-exempt tasks
    5. Leaves of Absence Law
    • Family medical leave act
    • Sexual harassment in the workplace

    Course Credit per State


    CA - General: 1.25 Credits
    CT - General: 1.25 Credits
    FL - General: 1.25 Credits
    NV - General: 1.0 Credits
    NY - General: 1.5 Credits
    PA - Distance Learning: 1.5 Credits
    WA - General: 1.25 Credits
    WV - General: 1.54 Credits

    Course Presenter(s)

    David Graulich, Esq.

    Mr. Graulich worked over 20 years in journalism and the public relations industry. He represented companies such as PepsiCo, Schwab and Computer Sciences Corp., advising senior executives on communications policies. Mr. Graulich received his law degree at the University of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law. Mr. Graulich is currently working in private practice and resides in Sacramento, California.

  Course Price:
$24.99
 
 

The Role of Compliance

View Course Details

The Role of Compliance Details


Price:
$39.99

Course Description

In this program seasoned attorney and Chief Compliance Officer Charles A Christofilis provides attorneys with an overview of the laws and rules which govern the area of compliance, the many legal areas in which the compliance officer must operate, the "four pillars" of compliance, and numerous case examples in which inadequate compliance has resulted in major adverse consequences for companies.

He addresses how to develop. Implement and test a Compliance Program in virtually and industry, and does a deep dive into the financial services and public company space. Specifically, the roles of the SEC and other agencies, the Investment Advisers Act, the Anti-Money Laundering provisions under the Patriot Act (with numerous examples), the FCPA and the necessity of internal audits and mock examinations.

Finally, he concludes with how to manage regulatory examinations and investigations as opposed to more traditional civil or criminal litigation, and respond to compliance failures from a crises management perspective when they occur.

Course Agenda

  • Why Compliance is increasingly important
  • How to develop, implement and test a Compliance Program;
  • Financial, Healthcare, IT and Public company (SOX) Implications)
  • Four Pillars of Compliance:
    • Controls;
    • Testing;
    • Ownership; and
    • Training.
  • Annual Review Process;
  • Liability / Conflicts;
  • Civil, Criminal and Reputational Implication / Crises Management.

Course Credit per State


AK - Voluntary: 2.0 Credits
AZ - General: 2.0 Credits
CA - General: 2.0 Credits
CO - General: 2.34 Credits
MO - Self Study: 2.34 Credits
NY - General: 2.0 Credits
WA - General: 2.0 Credits
WV - General: 2.34 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Charles A. Christofilis, Esq.

Charles A. Christofilis, Esq. has served as Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), Senior Counsel and/or General Counsel for Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers for over a decade. Mr. Christofilis received a J.D. from Touro Law, an MBA in finance from the University of San Francisco a Bachelor?s degree in management from Pace University in New York and is a Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist. Mr. Christofilis is an attorney admitted to the bars of New York, New Jersey and California (CA In-House Counsel) and has Series 7, 63, 24, 79 and 27 designations from FINRA.

  Course Price:
$39.99
 
 

Workplace Investigations 101

View Course Details

Workplace Investigations 101 Details


Price:
$19.99

Course Description

In any kind of business, there is a chance that employers will be required to investigate one or more employees at some point for allegations of misconduct such as discrimination or sexual harassment. A properly conducted workplace investigation is not only legally required but can also go a long way in protecting companies and mitigating risks for future problems.

In this webinar, Marin County, California attorneys Diana Maier and Beth Arnese go over the key things to know about workplace investigations so that you can garner the maximum legal protection such investigations may provide.

Topics addressed include when to investigate, how to prepare for an investigation, how to interview witnesses, how to prepare a written report, what to do after the investigation, and overall best practices for investigations.

Course Agenda

  • Why Do You Have to Investigate?
  • What Triggers the Duty To Investigate?
  • Benefits of An Investigation (Under California Law)
  • Benefits of An Investigation (Under Federal Law)
  • What Happens If You Don?t Investigate?
  • Attorneys as Investigators
  • Internal Personnel as Investigators
  • Ethical Issues to Understand
  • Privacy Issues
  • Before The Investigation: Preparation
  • Admonitions to The People You?re Interviewing
  • Interviews
  • How to Effectively Interview
  • How to Effectively Interview, Cont.
  • Where to Conduct the Interviews
  • Note-Taking During Interviews
  • Witness Statements
  • Steps to Take After Interviews Are Done
  • When Do You Want a Written Report?
  • Drafting The Report
  • Corrective Action Following the Investigation
  • Some Considerations (If Discrimination or Harassment Took Place)
  • Investigation Best Practices

Course Credit per State


CA - General: 1.0 Credits
CO - General: 1.2 Credits
CT - General: 1.0 Credits
FL - General: 1.0 Credits
IL - General: 1.0 Credits
NV - General: 1.0 Credits
NY - General: 1.0 Credits
WA - General: 1.0 Credits
WV - General: 1.2 Credits

Course Presenter(s)

Diana Maier

Diana Maier is an employment and privacy law expert who founded The Law Offices of Diana Maier, PC, a San Francisco Bay Area company that provides exceptional customer service in privacy and employment law. Diana and her team advise companies on the legality of their workplace privacy and employment practices, litigate cases when needed, and conduct workplace investigations. Diana is certified in both European Union and US privacy laws and is a fluent Spanish-speaker.

Diana attended Stanford Law School and graduated in 1998. She received a Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service, magna cum laude, from Georgetown University in 1992.

Diana began her legal career as a Public Defender for Santa Clara County, where she spent each day in the courtroom defending misdemeanor, felony, and three strike cases. She enjoyed great success in winning trials for her clients and felt that she had found her ?calling? in life. But in 2003, Diana decided to transition to a career that was more sustainable for family life, and she began practicing employment law. She joined forces with the plaintiffs? employment law firm Bushnell, Caplan & Fielding, LLP, which later became Bushnell, Caplan, Fielding & Maier, LLP. Diana left the firm in 2008 in order to launch the Law Offices of Diana Maier and focus more on the defense side of employment work, particularly litigation preventative work.

In early 2013, Diana began working as outsourced In-House Counsel for Labor and Employment and Privacy Law for Quantum Corporation in Silicon Valley. To handle this role more skillfully, Diana earned two privacy credentials, CIPP/US and CIPP/E, through the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). Diana?s CIPP/US and CIPP/E certifications represent her dedication to thoroughly understanding global privacy laws for the benefit her clients. By knowing and applying privacy and data protection laws and regulations in the United States and Europe, Diana is able to ensure privacy compliance on a global scale.

Diana is a frequent speaker and writer on an enormous range of topics in employment and privacy law. She presents a quarterly public webinar (which can be found on her website under ?Lunchtime Legal Chats?) and also frequently speaks to the Marin County & San Francisco Bar Associations, as well as numerous non-attorney organizations. She has been published in The Recorder, the ABA Journal, and countless online publications, and she is often cited as an expert in news stories pertinent to employment and privacy law. You can find handouts from her presentations and articles featuring her at www.dianamaierlaw.com/resources. Diana is the former Chair of the Marin County Bar Association Labor and Employment section, and she serves as an advisor in the areas of employment law and privacy to Casetext, a legal start-up organization in Silicon Valley.

Diana's legal hobbies are blogging on employment and privacy law issues and exploring the practice of compassionate law, the idea that lawyers can be problem solvers and healers of conflict rather than just combatants for hire. Diana especially enjoys serving on the Board and heading up the Fundraising Committee of OneJustice, a California based legal non-profit that provides legal services to marginalized populations who otherwise wouldn?t have access to an attorney.

You can read Diana?s blog at www.dianamaierlaw.com/employment-and-privacy-law-blog-by-diana-maier/ and also read about her talented staff at www.dianamaierlaw.com/about/staff-bios/. Her email is diana@dianamaierlaw.com, and her phone number is 415-515-1707. In addition, you can find her on LinkedIn and on Twitter under @DianaMaierLaw, to name just a few social media sites where Diana likes to ?hang out? and talk law.

Beth Arnese

Beth Arnese received her J.D. from UCLA Law School in 2005. She practiced law for over 10 years, at both large firms and for the public sector, before joining the Law Offices of Diana Maier in 2016. She specializes in litigation as well as employment and privacy law. Beth also conducts workplace investigations.

  Course Price:
$19.99
 


About Contact US FAQ State Rules
© 2009-2020 MCLEZ P.O. Box 215 Patterson CA 95363 Toll Free: 877-406-2539 | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use - Analytics